Maps
Browse through maps depicting Bay health and restoration, including pollution trends, public access sites and more.
Riparian Forest Buffer Restoration (2009)
Date created: February 17, 2010This map shows the locations of riparian forest buffer restoration projects throughout the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Project locations were provided by Forestry Workgroup representatives from the Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Virginia Department of Forestry, and Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources.
View mapChemical Contaminants (2009)
Date created: February 17, 2010Tidal waters that are impaired for part or all of the indicated Bay segment by toxic chemicals based on each state's implementation of the Clean Water Act.
View mapFish Passage Progress (2009) in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed
Date created: February 12, 2010Fish passage is a key component to the restoration of anadromous fish (shad and river herring) in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. These fish are blocked from much of their historic spawning areas, which included waters over 200 miles from the Bay. Maryland, Virginia, Pennsylvania and the District of Columbia have set goals to provide fish passage to make much of those historic spawning areas once again accessible to migratory fish. Other species that benefit from the unblocking of streams include eels, native species such as brook trout and other resident species.
View mapBay Grasses (SAV) Restoration Goal Achievement: Single Best Year 2006-2008
Date created: March 24, 2009This map shows progress toward achieving the Chesapeake Bay Program segment-specific underwater bay grass restoration goals. It is based on the single best year of acreage as observed through the most recent three years of data from the Chesapeake Bay underwater bay grasses aerial survey.
View mapFish Passage Progress (2008) in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed
Date created: March 18, 2009Fish passage is a key component to the restoration of anadromous fish (shad and river herring) in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. These fish are blocked from much of their historic spawning areas, which included waters over 200 miles from the Bay. Maryland, Virginia, Pennsylvania and the District of Columbia have set goals to provide fish passage to make much of those historic spawning areas once again accessible to migratory fish. Other species that benefit from the unblocking of streams include eels, native species such as brook trout and other resident species.
View mapBay Grasses Planted (2008)
Date created: March 11, 2009In 2003, the CBP adopted the Strategy to Accelerate the Protection and Restoration of Submerged Aquatic Vegetation in the Chesapeake Bay including a commitment to plant 1,000 acres by 2008. The program partners have thus far planted 15% of their initial goal. In 2008, 8.5 acres were planted with funding from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and other sources. Both funding for SAV planting, and capacity for doing it, will need to be increased dramatically to meet the goal on time.
View mapRiparian Forest Buffer Restoration (2008)
Date created: March 9, 2009This map shows the locations of riparian forest buffer restoration projects throughout the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Project locations were provided by Forestry Workgroup representatives from the Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Virginia Department of Forestry, and Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources.
View mapChlorophyll a (2008) Percent Goal Achieved
Date created: March 9, 2009The 2008 Chlorophyll a percent of goal achievement by CBP segment.
View mapMid-Channel Water Clarity (2008)
Date created: March 9, 2009This map shows the percent of the Water Clarity goal achieved for each Chesapeake Bay Segment in 2008.
View mapShad Abundance (2008)
Date created: March 4, 2009American shad were once the most abundant and economically important species in the Chesapeake Bay. Shad are anadromous fish and spend most of their lives in the ocean, returning to freshwater rivers to spawn after they reach maturity. Data for the York and Potomac Rivers were provided by the Virginia Institute of Marine Science via an ongoing Catch per Unit Effort (CPUE) study involving American Shad gill-netting. Data for the Susquehanna and James Rivers represent published fishway passage values for Conowingo and Boshers Dams, respectively.
View map